Add to List
Request Correction
Write Plot
Write Review Movie Information
Full Reviews
Movie Lists
Movie Talk
Quick Movie Reviews
Rating of
0.5/4
Matthew Brady - wrote on 11/02/2013
What's the point of remaking a true horror classic just to do all over again... "POINTLESS".
Rating of
2.5/4
The SHC - wrote on 03/25/2009
This movie kind of surprised me. When I heard they remade one of my favourite movies ever made, and even cast Vince Vaughn as Norman Bates, I thought "well, you can only **** with it." I was actually kind of surprised. While it is not nearly as good as the origional, Van Sant does a great job with it and it actually is alot better than Psycho III. I was very surprised by how good Vince Vaughn was at playing Norman. While he's no Anthony Perkins, he really gives his best performance of his career in this movie. I'd give it a shot,just don't expect it to be as good as the origional, great Hitchcock masterpeice.
Rating of
0.5/4
Unknown - wrote on 07/30/2008
Waste of time. Fans of the original, don't watch it. People who haven't seen either, watch the original. There is no point to remaking a movie exactly scene for scene. NO point!
Rating of
2/4
Chris Kavan - wrote on 07/30/2007
An almost shot-for-shot remake of the original psycho, which begs the question, why? Despite the modern feel, I can't help but compare it to the original and if you're not bringing much new to the table, you can't touch Hitchcock.
Rating of
2.5/4
Alex - wrote on 06/26/2007
Vince Vaughn does a great job of being actually insane. It is not really a good remake nor is it a bad one. Only see this if you have an open mind about remakes. Some scenes are better than the original and it does have a modern feel.
