Quick Movie Reviews
☠ kyrstin. ♒ - wrote on 08/05/2011
Iiii loved this movie. :D. The acting was fucking awesome, especially when it comes to Amanda Seyfried's performance as Chloe. The budget is high, the acting as I said is great, very realistic, it pulls you in and holds onto you until the very end. This movie was not predictable OR cliche, and the ending was awesome. Just wow. :)) REALLY good. The twist is NOT what you expect it to be.
Jenna - wrote on 07/05/2011
Not a bad movie, definitely could have been better and more action-y and the end could have been significantly more interesting, but it really isn't horrible as one might assume. Julianne Moore is always fantastic, as is Liam Neeson, but he didn't have much screen time in this one. Probably the best role I've seen Amanda Seyfriend in, I see in her in a whole new light now. A very perculiar but very interesting film.
Chris Kavan - wrote on 03/10/2011
Wants to be an edgy thriller, but can't quite make the grade. Although I think both Amanda Seyfried and Julianne Moore did a good job with their characters, the whole story was just too predictable and kind of ridiculous.
Tasha - wrote on 10/04/2010
SUCH a disappointment. Not saying I expected a whole lot from it, but I didn't think it would be so damn predictable. However, I did think Amanda Seyfried did an excellent job
Allison - wrote on 04/19/2010
The original movie, Nathalie... was better. However, Chloe tries to explore and add twists. However, one of the twists (possible minor spoilers) included a lesbian subplot that was way laughable. I didn't believe that the women would embark on that kind of journey so lightly and then dismiss it so lightly. It was definitely like a straight man came up with the idea to lesbify the original movie, although interestingly enough a woman wrote the script adaptation.