Quick Movie Reviews
Logan D. McCoy - wrote on 06/01/2019
Tod Browning's version of "Dracula" is as artistic as it is atmospheric, and after 75 years, it still holds up better than nearly every other adaptation of Bram Stoker's horror novel to come after it.
Matthew Brady - wrote on 07/22/2015
Dracula (1931 film) was both magnificent in it's storytelling and settings, and it was Bela Lugosi greatest and the most remembered performance of his career.
mitchellyoung - wrote on 05/23/2012
Despite a constant hanging veil of campiness (particularly with some of the line-reading), 1931's Dracula is a true horror classic that birthed much of the imagery and mythos that has contributed to vampire films over the years. Bela Lugosi gives an other-worldly and creepy performance the set design is impeccably dark.
Ichabod Crane - wrote on 07/26/2009
Dracula is an old movie in every way possible. To the look acting everything else, and it has some interesting nostalgia value but at the same time the aged way it is makes it nor scary or overtly interesting. But you won't be completely bored by it if you appreciate it old style, and Bela Lugosi does make for one very memorable Dracula.
sapien - wrote on 11/11/2008
It was a decent movie. But, certainly nothing special.
Alex - wrote on 05/13/2007
This original Dracula is a magnificent look at how good movies used to be made. Yes cheesy and dated, but it has some spunk and evokes fear at times. The new score added to the film helps it by leaps and bounds. Watch with patience though.