Create Game Lists on
FilmCrave home
   Movies  Members
Search +
Searching... Close  
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
  Login Using Facebook

A Selection from My Collection: Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King

View Chris Kavan's Profile

By Chris Kavan - 05/28/11 at 08:26 AM CT

As this is a completely random pick from the films I own, Iíll just jump right into the third part of an epic trilogy. I have to hand it to Peter Jackson, it deserves every one of the 11 Academy Awards it ended up winning in 2004.

While Two Towers will always remain my favorite film of the trilogy, Return of the King isnít far behind. In fact, if it werenít for the somewhat extra-long end(ings) that keep coming at you, I would put this first on the list. While the first film was all about introducing characters and motivations, the second film was essentially one giant battle Ė this third entry manages to find a good balance between the action and the story of the ring itself.

As always -- SPOILERS AHEAD --

Not surprisingly, since the one ring plays an important part, the film starts off with our favorite CGI character (before he become computer generated) Smeagol and how he came upon the ring and transformed into the fish-eating, split personality Gollum.

Then, because itís Lord of the Rings, we suddenly splinter off into branching stories: the journey of Frodo, Sam, Gollum and the Ring; Pippin and Gandolfís journey to the white city Minas Tirith where they run afoul of the steward Denethor, who had gone a little mad; then we have the Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli recruiting the ultimate Deus Ex Machina of an unstoppable undead army and finally Merry joins Eowyn to fight with the massive army of the Rohirrim in the Battle for Pelennor Fields (where the majority of our stories finally join).

Now, if your eyes kind of just glazed over at the just reading that paragraph, let me tell you better carve out a chunk of time, especially if youíre going for the extended edition (and really, why wouldnít you?). At a 251-minute run time (or a little over four hours) itís not just a movie, itís a commitment. To me itís worth the time spent.

For one, the casting continues to be great. There arenít too many new characters this time around, but John Noble as Denethor and David Wenham in an expanded role as his forsaken son Faramir are both welcome. Noble, whom Iím fuming hasnít won an Emmy yet for Fringe, plays his character perfectly so that you feel pity, yet at the same time donít feel so bad when he finally meets his end.

Most of the other new characters are buried in costume and makeup Ė the heavily-armored Nazgul Witchking of Angmar, the ghastly green King of the Dead and his army, a wonderfully-deformed Orc leader Gothmog and the creatures Ė giant spider Shelob and the finally the Oliphaunts and their horse-wrecking charge. Those who view the extended edition also get to see what has to be the creepiest character in the entire trilogy, the Mouth of Sauron Ė brief as it may be. While Gollum still steals the show as the most impressive computer-generated feat, Jackson isnít one to shy away from crafting some amazing visual effects.

Still, itís approaching eight years since Return of the King graced the screen and even a film as wonderful as this can show its age. Iím sure the upcoming Blu-Ray release will put some new luster to this franchise, but I can say that the DVD version, while I wonít say suffers, clearly does not live up to the potential it can have in true HD. It just goes to show how far technology has come in eight years when Iím complaining about how the effects are lacking.

The music also continues to be a high point. While John Williams will forever remain my favorite composer, Howard Shore makes the Lord of the Rings his own. It also helps that Billy Boyd has quite a powerful solo and that Annie Lennox ends the series on a high note with ďInto the West.Ē Also help ending on a high note is production designer Alan Lee, who crafts what I believe is some of the finest credits to grace any film.

The final film also plays heavy on emotion. You can call if friendship, you can even call it love, but the journey taken by the characters show their relationships are very close. Frodo and Sam, Merry and Pippin and, to a lesser extent, Legolas and Gimli Ė these are the pairs that drive the story. You also have Aragorn and Arwen Ė and Eowyn Ė plus Denethor and Faramir fractured relationship Ė these likewise have an important part to play. Finally, what may prove to be the most important relationship in the film Ė Gollum and the Ring Ė his ďpreciousĒ ultimately is what determines how this story ends when he finally is reunited with his true love.

Now, while I dearly think the film deserves all accolades, it still doesnít mean it isnít without flaws. Even Jackson didnít like the Army of the Dead and only included it as a nod to the books. It seems far too convenient and only serves as an easy way to kill a lot of enemies very quickly. Likewise, I donít care how nice things turn out, the film is really too long. The ending is broken up into what I would call rescue/recovery - coronation - wedding - and final farewell (plus a sweet coda). Heck, that takes about 45 minutes right there.

I found myself nodding off (it was approaching midnight Ė I guess I should have started watching earlier) and maybe they could have been a bit more judicious in the editing.

Still, I have to say the flaws are pretty minor compared to most other films. At 11 for 11 Oscar wins, one of the most impressive world-wide grosses and, most important in my mind, living up the source material J.R.R. Tolkien provided, Return of the King truly proves that the third time is the charm and closes out a trilogy with grandeur and emotion. Hopefully the magic can once again be captured when The Hobbit finally makes it to the big screen.


Avoid spam Captcha: Sign Up + or Log In +   

View Alex's Profile


Wrote on 05/31/11 at 09:12 AM CT

So if Two Towers is your favorite, why didn't that deserve the award?

Write on Profile +

View Chris's Profile


Wrote on 05/30/11 at 11:14 AM CT

It's not that the special effects are necessarily bad - just that technology has caught up. Even if it's on a smaller scale, films like District 9, Iron Man, Transformers - on a special effects level - are just as sophisticated. While the length is what prevents it from being my favorite of the trilogy, it doesn't prevent it from being a great film. I stand by that it deserves every award, no matter how indulgent it may run.

Write on Profile +

View Naveen's Profile


Wrote on 05/29/11 at 02:48 PM CT

Loved this pick and your write-up, but it's spelled G-a-n-d-a-l-f (no "o") just so you know.

Write on Profile +

View Alex's Profile


Wrote on 05/28/11 at 09:50 AM CT

Chris - nice write up. But I would disagree on many accounts of your post. I think ROTK is the worst of the trilogy. It is much too long for any movie, no matter the source material. If Peter Jackson didn't have such a hard on for himself, he would have done the movie justice and condensed the endings. He is clearly arogant and cocky when it comes to his films and he proved yet again that he can't make an original material (see his latest work).

I also disagree about the special effects. What movie has better special effects? I can only think of one - King Kong. Avatar lacks true texture and realistic motion for the most part.

Fellowship of the ring is the most complete movie - a great begining, and an amazingly drawing ending. I will never understand the 11 academy awards that ROTK recieved. Kill Bill 1 and 2, 28 Days Later and even Old School were all better than this in 2003.

Write on Profile +

Recent Blog Posts

All Posts

December 2018

November 2018

October 2018

September 2018

August 2018

July 2018

June 2018

May 2018

April 2018

March 2018

February 2018

January 2018

December 2017

November 2017

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

December 2016

November 2016

October 2016

September 2016

August 2016

July 2016

June 2016

May 2016

April 2016

March 2016

February 2016

January 2016

December 2015

November 2015

October 2015

September 2015

August 2015

July 2015

June 2015

May 2015

April 2015

March 2015

February 2015

January 2015

December 2014

November 2014

October 2014

September 2014

August 2014

July 2014

June 2014

May 2014

April 2014

March 2014

February 2014

January 2014

December 2013

November 2013

October 2013

September 2013

August 2013

July 2013

June 2013

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012

June 2012

May 2012

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

Log In
Help on how to log into FilmCrave
Login with Facebook
Login with FilmCrave
What Members Are Doing
Movie Talk
New Movie Reviews
New Movie Lists
Movies I Want To See by Rod
Movies I've Watched by Chris Ghost
Movies I Want To See by OracleElizabeth
movies of 2019 by skater4159
Movies First Seen in 2018 by royaluglydudes
Movies of 2017 by Stoney McStonerson
Best films of 2009 by Daniel
The Films of the Coen Brothers by SIngli6




Contact FilmCrave Public Relations    

Advertise and Business

Developer API

Contact Us


About us



Support FilmCrave

FAQ and Help

News and Press

Terms of Use


Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
Are you sure you want to delete this blog?