memento_mori's Movie Review of Unforgiven (1992)

Rating of

Unforgiven (1992)

It ain't bad, but it ain't special either.
memento_mori - wrote on 06/22/13

I simply do not understand why people love this movie.

The movie was okay. It had many flaws, unlikable characters and boring scene after boring scene.
I understand what Clint Eastwood was trying to do. He chose a different route and made a less-than-action-packed Western.
I can't relate to the characters at all. We're supposed to sympathize with William Munney (especially in the last few scenes), but I can't bring myself to like him and want him to succeed, especially when he has such a cruel and unforgivable (haha, Unforgiv-able) past and character.
English Bob is an extremely useless character. He's only there so that Gene Hackman can shout a few insults at him, which lend no perspective or bring the story further.
Ned was fine, but again, I didn't sympathize with him or think he was the big character because he had nothing to do. He was basically just a tag-along. The Kid was annoying, but I loved the scene with his confession.

What I loved was the direction and the dialogue. Clint Eastwood is good at filming action scenes. The film is filled with many long, gorgeous wide-angle shots and there are no quick-cuts, so I also praise the editing.
I applaud Eastwood for taking a risk and making it dark, but it was a little far-fetched.

In conclusion, I can't say this movie was bad, but it wasn't special either and surely didn't deserve 4 Oscars, including Best Picture and being brand-marked as one of the best Westerns of all time, especially when its main underlying tone is… nothing.

Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
Are you sure you want to delete this review?
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?