Movie Talk Posts
Adict - wrote on 2010-06-06 05:42
... and Marvel is recreating the bad DC versions with Marvel characters.
Northeast Kid - wrote on 2010-06-05 15:32
Not sure what you are talking about? Batman is not by Marvel. DC does Batman and Superman.
Adict - wrote on 2010-06-05 00:34
I just do not get why Marvel is trying to recreate the old cheesy Batman flicks. I mean, Daredevil was essentially the first Batman from Burton with worse acting and much worse special effects. So, it's not too bad when people like me say it was terrible, but it is too bad when Hollywood and Marvel just rush out everything in a less than 1/2 assed manner.
ONDeShay - wrote on 2010-05-20 17:12
I dug iron man 2 but I'm more a comedy person. It's too bad people say it was horrible, but in some ways I'd rather see Get Him to the greek or dinner for shmucks than a blockbuster. Don't need special effects to wow me
Adict - wrote on 2010-05-20 00:32
It was terrible. Re-hashed, overcast, jargony- more akin to Batman & Robin: ewwwwwwww!
Northeast Kid - wrote on 2010-05-08 10:48
Yeah this movie was OK. I can't believe there are not other reviews on here yet. Was it better than the first for most of you?