Watch Trailer
Add to List
Request Correction
Write Plot
Write Review Movie Information
Quick Reviews
Movie Lists
Movie Talk
Full Movie Reviews
Rating of
0.5/4
Leave this movie in the ground; stop digging it up
Daniel - wrote on 09/26/2020
.5 star out 4. Stop bringing back movies that are meh. That is really the only thing i can call it. It is still better than what i can do with a camera phone, but at this point, it aged so much, that you have to convince yourself to like it. I used to watch these types of movies, when i was a kid. These movies, were still watchable back in the 80's and even 90's. But outside of a history of cinematography class, this has little relevance. The film is obviously intended for a 1950's audience, which i am not complaining about, seeing what Netflix is doing, for example. However, it is so out of place today. If you are a movie buff for the retro, then yes, academy aware winner movie The War of the Worlds from 1953 is not a bad movie, but for me, it is a dead title.
Rating of
1.5/4
War of the Worlds
SmokeScreener - wrote on 03/03/2009
Sadly, the original "War of the Worlds" (1953) was a very unfocused movie. It wavered between trying to be a character drama and a disaster movie, but it really failed at both.
For starters, the lead actor (Gene Barry) portrayed a smug, unlikable character. This made it hard for me to care whether or not he survived, or whether he and Ann Robinson would actually fell in love.
Without a core group of characters to care about, you are forced to focus on the disaster movie elements, which in this case involve a bunch of hovering spaceships blasting their way through Los Angeles and the rest of the world. Most of this plays in documentary/newsreel style in an attempt to recreate the success of the Orson Welles radio drama that created so much panic. If like me you are bored with …
