| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
G.I. Joe: Retaliation (2013) Movie Information |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 Click image to view poster at MoviePosterDB.com
|
|
|
|
| |
Overall Rank: |
9193 |
Avg. Rating: |
2.24/4 |
# of Ratings: |
19 |
Genres: |
Action, Adventure |
Rating: |
PG-13 |
Language: |
English |
Theater Date: | 03/28/2013 |
|
|
Director: |
Jon Chu |
Actors: |
Channing Tatum Dwayne Johnson Ray Stevenson Adrianne Palicki Ray Park Byung-hun Lee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plot Outline:
|
Zartan and his minions have managed to co-op some of the most influential world leaders to further their nefarious plans. It's up the G.I. Joes to stop Zartan before his plans bear fruit. -- Chris Kavan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snoogans 03/29/2013 (0 of 0 found this helpful) |
Rating of 2/4 |
You get everything you would expect from a movie like this. Confusing plot, completely underdeveloped characters, bad dialogue and zero substance. But we all know the real reason to watch this film is to see some slam-bang action, and on that front it completely delivers. I give it points just for the fact that it succeeds at what it's trying to be; a senseless action flick. The breakneck speed and awesomely ludicrous fights help to overlook the major flaws here. And it never bored me. Much better than 'The Rise of Cobra', but barely a rental at best. |
| Write comment +View all reviews +
Was this review helpful?
Yes No |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
03/31/2013 (0 of 0 found this helpful) |
|
Better than the first but not great |
|
I don't want to spoil anything for people still looking to see the film. This movie was a much better live action translation of the GI Joe cartoon from the 80's. No longer are the Joes superheroes running around in Halo suits but actually an elite military fighting force. The costumes were a vast improvement over the first movie, especially snake eyes, and the fight scenes were action packed. Unfortunately that is about all this movie has going for it.
It's main flaw was the story or lack there of. There are three separate story lines that the audience is constantly thrown between with little explanation or transition. It tries to tie them all together in the end but really just leaves a jumbo mess with too many loose ends to count.
The next issue was the characters. Even as a fan... |
Rating of 2.5/4 |
| read more + |
| |
|
|
| Write comment +View all reviews +
Was this review helpful?
Yes No |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
03/29/2013 (0 of 0 found this helpful) |
|
I Really Hope this Flops |
|
This movie was not meant for me. This movie was designed to appeal mostly to 13 year old boys (and men who are still in touch with their inner 13 year old boy.) Apparently the me that existed when I was that age has been completely eradicated because I found very little to enjoy in G.I. Joe: Retaliation.
I was not a huge fan of Olympus has Fallen (which was released in theaters last weekend,) but at least it understood what makes action as a genre appealing to an adult audience. This film just throws explosions, ninjas and pointless pg-13 sensual sequences in hopes of entertaining its pubescent target audience. The result is that G.I. Joe: Retaliation feels more like a children’s film then a blockbuster release made for all age groups.
The action sequences are well put together... |
Rating of 1.5/4 |
| read more + |
| |
|
|
| Write comment +View all reviews +
Was this review helpful?
Yes No |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
03/29/2013 (0 of 0 found this helpful) |
|
G.I. Joe: Retaliation |
|
G.I. Joe: Retaliation (2013) The G. I. Joe team is in a world of trouble as they have been framed as traitors – traitors to their own country. To make matters worse, Cobra’s own Zartan (Arnold Vosloo) is in power, impersonating the President of the United States. The Joes are going to need help getting their country back, so how about the original Joe, General Joseph Colton (Bruce Willis) joining back up with the team? Do not see this film in 3-D! The film was not shot in 3-D but converted later to the format, and combine that with the shaky-cam used in most of the action sequences, and it will be either sick to your stomach or headache time for you. Additional scenes with Channing Tatum were added, but these “Bromance” scenes with Dwayne Johnson seemed forced. The dialogue for most of th... |
Rating of 2/4 |
| read more + |
| |
|
|
| Write comment +View all reviews +
Was this review helpful?
Yes No |
| |
|
|
|
But I heard they're adding even more Channing Tatum - but the 3D aspect, I believe, is just an excuse for them thinking it just won't hold up against the competition. My interest was already pretty low to begin with, so pushing it that far back doesn't really make things any worse for me, anyway. |
06/01/2012 1:04 pm CT
reply +
report spam + |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm okay with the pushing of the release date. I just wish they would've put it at the end of August, or even in September. The much longer wait will have a lot of people loosing interest in the film. And this new 3D conversion feels like a waste. |
05/27/2012 1:07 am CT
reply +
report spam + |
|
|
|
|
|
Big news for those keeping track of summer blockbusters - G.I. Joe will not be amongst them as it has been pushed to March 2013 for "3D Conversion" http://www.deadline.com/2 012/05/g-i-joe-retaliatio n-moving-to-march-2012-to -add-3d-for-bigger-foreig n-box-office/
It's actually a smart move - I think this year is filled to the brim with huge films and I don't think G.I. Joe Retaliation (even with The Rock) stood a chance at matching up to, say, The Avengers or The Dark Knight Rises or The Amazing Spider-Man. I think 3D is just an excuse (and kind of a lame one if you ask me) but I do think it means the film has a much better chance of doing well at the box office if simply because it won't have as much competition. |
05/23/2012 9:05 pm CT
reply +
report spam + |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|