Scooby-Doo (2002) Movie Reviews

Daniel Corleone 11/20/2012 (0 of 0 found this helpful)

Rating of
1.5/4 

Not an impressive story, bad effects and a lackluster made for TV cast. Even the cartoons had better plot than this. One of many films that should have been a television show rather than a movie. Not enjoyable for kids and just plain dull for adults. As mentioned by other fellow members, the humor was not even solid enough to bare viewing. Scooby-Doo tries to widen its market and fails horribly as a film.

SIngli6 12/29/2011 (0 of 0 found this helpful)

Rating of
0.5/4 

I censure children to a further degree than most, but is the subjection to the inutterable abhorrence of this filmic manifestation of unrepentant evil even excessively cruel for the foulest of humanity's malefactors? Well, if there is one person living on earth whom deserves to watch this film, then humanity has no reason to take pride in that which constitutes his form and condition.

dukeakasmudge 09/14/2011 (0 of 0 found this helpful)

Rating of
4/4 

I didnt think Id like a live version movie of Scooby Doo but this was good

Snoogans 09/10/2011 (0 of 0 found this helpful)

Rating of
1/4 

A crass and dumb update of a classic cartoon. This film is not at all consistant with the show. It tries to be an homage and a parody, but fails on both levels.

mitchellyoung 01/30/2011 (0 of 0 found this helpful)

Rating of
1.5/4 

The original Scooby-Doo cartoon wasn't that great, but I could see a spoof on some of the shortcomings of the series as working. Unfortunately, this film is content to rely on juvenile humor and poor caricatures of the series and only comes across as dumb and pointless.

Mr.Cinema 10/30/2010 (0 of 0 found this helpful)

Rating of
2.5/4 

This is a movie that could have been good but stunk because of one thing. What was it? MATTHEW FUCKING LILLARD!!! Matthew Lillard is an annoying mugging jackhole who makes you want to tear your hair out. Everything else about this movie was... okay. It wasnt horrible, but they could have made the first live-action Scooby-Doo movie a little more dignified. What really makes me pissed is Lillard revised his roll of Shaggy in "Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed". I grew up with Scooby, so please, for any directors out there who want to make another live-action Scooby-Doo please, NO MATTHEW LILLARD!

Chris Kavan 10/11/2010 (0 of 0 found this helpful)

Rating of
1.5/4 

Thanks for ruining yet another childhood memory for me, Hollywood. And they still made sequels out of this?! Too much low-brow humor, even with a manageable cast. The one thing they got right? Putting Scrappy in his place.

3SntnceRvws! 06/02/2009 (0 of 0 found this helpful)

Rating of
1/4 

We avidly watched Scooby and his kooky mysteries as children and thus the big screen version was an inriguing premise. While it has fun at first and sets up the horrible Scrappy as the villain (PLUS!) it also runs out of gas in about twenty minutes. Children may enjoy the constant fart humor and cheap CGI effects and some adults may even bask while reminiscing of their childhood (and also continue to wonder why Johnny Quest never gets a film deal).