|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Overall Rank: |
990 |
Avg. Rating: |
2.72/4 |
# of Ratings: |
185 |
Genres: |
Fantasy, Action |
Rating: |
PG-13 |
Language: |
English |
DVD Release: |
10/21/2008 |
|
|
Director: |
Louis Leterrier |
Actors: |
Edward Norton
Liv Tyler
William Hurt
Tim Roth
Tim Blake Nelson
Ty Burrell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plot outline:
Add Plot + View Plots +
|
In this comic book movie based off of the same name of the Marvel hero (and a new version to the 2001 release) a scientist whose experiment goes wrong is forced to try to cope with his anger and the mysterious after affects of what he has become and what he can become. He must try to control his anger but use it wisely enough to destroy a more deadly, out of control version of himself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sapien 08/11/2009 (0 of 0 found this helpful) |
Rating of
2.5/4 |
It's not as good as other superhero movies, but since it has Edward Norton in it, it's still pretty good. |
| Write comment +View all reviews +
Was this review helpful? Yes No
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chris aka Tarkin 05/10/2009 (0 of 0 found this helpful) |
Rating of
2.5/4 |
A much more action-packed Incredible Hulk than Ang Lee's version. It's not necessarily better (though I prefer Norton over Bana any day) but it's not worse either. I do think this one is much more fun to watch. |
| Write comment +View all reviews +
Was this review helpful? Yes No
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bimmerchik4 03/09/2009 (0 of 0 found this helpful) |
Rating of
2.5/4 |
I haven't seen the first one. I thought it was pretty good. I love Edward Norton I thought he played the part really well. The special effects were good. Overall a decent action movie. |
| Write comment +View all reviews +
Was this review helpful? Yes No
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
01/26/2010 (0 of 0 found this helpful) |
|
Lazy and insufficient |
|
I know the concept of 'Hulk' is primarily all about HULK SMASH but when it comes to making a compelling and entertaining film, relying HULK SMASH just isn't enough. Bruce Banner is a complex character and they could have taken more care with conveying this. Instead, they went for the easy road and gave us another mediocre action film that just happened to have the Hulk in it. I really felt it needed more. |
Rating of
2/4 |
|
|
| Write comment +View all reviews +
Was this review helpful? Yes No
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
05/26/2009 (0 of 0 found this helpful) |
|
Nice come back. |
|
The movies is good for several reasons, one of the them is the attempt to keep continuity and consistency, and the other is the effort to make it similar to the tv show.
Listening the music, specially, bought me a tear to my eye. The rest is all hollywood crap, but at least its cool and entertaining. Ed Norton can make anything. Glad to see some diversity there. |
Rating of
3/4 |
|
|
| Write comment +View all reviews +
Was this review helpful? Yes No
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
04/25/2009 (0 of 0 found this helpful) |
|
The Incredible Hulk |
|
This was a well-told follow-up to Ang Lee's "Hulk". Edward Norton gave a very sympathetic performance as David Banner, and Tim Roth was excellent as the villain.
Sadly, William Hurt's character chain-smokes cigars throughout the movie... including the opening credit sequence. This is an odd touch, since his character (Iplayed previously by Sam Elliottdid not smoke in the original film! As a result, the film earned a SmokeScreeners rating of 4 Butts (http://tinyurl.com/dz63le). |
Rating of
3/4 |
|
|
| Write comment +View all reviews +
Was this review helpful? Yes No
|
| |
|
|
|
