Yojimbo 09/19/2012 (0 of 0 found this helpful)

Rating of
0.5/4 

The worst Bond film by quite a long way. Walken is wasted, Grace Jones can't act and Moore hobbles through the "action" on a zimmer frame. Hopeless.

Chris Kavan 01/09/2012 (0 of 0 found this helpful)

Rating of
1.5/4 

One of the weaker Bond entries. By this time, Roger Moore is a bit long in the tooth to pull off the sauve spy. While Christopher Walken is a good choice for villain, the story just can't match up to classic Bond adventures.

Snoogans 05/09/2011 (0 of 0 found this helpful)

Rating of
2/4 

A drop from the previous entry. It's back to the goofy nature and muddled meandering of a few past Bonds staring Moore. Not a good one to end on his long run as the character.

Ichabod Crane 11/01/2009 (0 of 0 found this helpful)

Rating of
1.5/4 

A very poor bond film once again but there is some unintentional comedy to be found here. Not enough to recommend it though. Not a moment is believable about nor is it very entertaining. None of the action sequences are good and Roger Moore is far too old as Bond now and scenes involving him fighting are simply too hard to believe. The story is poor and does not involve a lot of interest and there is not a single satisfying action sequence. A side note is Christopher Walken as the Bond villain is surprisingly bad, he is not entertaining as he normally just automatically is.

Allison 08/01/2008 (0 of 0 found this helpful)

Rating of
2/4 

An interesting Bond movie, but not so great. It features Christopher Walken which was great. But overall, there wasn't much going for it. Just the normal Bond stuff.